Saturday 6 October 2012

Westpac, the Commonwealth Bank and National Australia Bank have cut their variable home loan rates but failed to match that of the Reserve Bank, citing the high costs of deposits.


Westpac, the Commonwealth Bank and National Australia Bank have cut their variable home loan rates but failed to match that of the Reserve Bank, citing the high costs of deposits.

Currency Converter

AMOUNT TO CONVERT
FROM
TO
or Table of all exchange rates

Australia And New Zealand Banking
company details

altTop travel snaps of 2012The winning shots from National Geographic's search for the best globe-trotting shutterbugs
The central bank cut the cash rate by 25 basis points to 3.25 per cent on Tuesday, sparking calls from politicians, interest groups and retailers for the major banks to pass on the reduction in full to mortgage customers.
NAB was the first major bank to move its interest rates, announcing early on Friday afternoon that it would cut its interest rates by 20 basis points.
Its standard variable interest rate will fall to 6.58 per cent from Monday, saving customers with a $300,000 mortgage an average $50 a month.
Rival CBA followed less than an hour later, matching NAB's cut, which will see its variable rate on home loans trimmed to 6.6 per cent on October 12.
Westpac moved next but its standard variable rate will only fall by 18 basis points to 6.71 per cent on October 15.
ANZ will review its lending rates at its regular monthly meeting on October 12.
Treasurer Wayne Swan said the banks' mortgage customers would be disappointed their lenders had decided against passing on in full the Reserve Bank's cut to the cash rate.
Earlier this week Australian Chamber of Commerce and Industry (ACCI) director of economics and industry policy Greg Evans said as the funding pressure for banks had significantly eased they no longer had a reason to hold back on rate cuts.
But Westpac, CBA and NAB all claimed that increased competition for deposits meant they were still facing significant funding pressures.
NAB's executive of personal banking Lisa Gray said while the bank was still committed to offering the lowest variable rate of the four majors, it also had an obligation to ensure Australian banks were safe and secure.
"Banks obtain funds for lending from deposits and from wholesale funding markets," she said in a statement.
"Around the world, banking regulators require banks to hold more stable forms of funding, like deposits, to reduce risk in the banking sector.
"The increased competition for deposits is pushing up costs, making it more expensive to fund our lending."
The CBA said it needed to balance the needs of its 1.8 million mortgage holders with those of its 11 million deposit holders and shareholders.
"One significant factor impacting this balancing of needs has been the increase in the cost of deposits noted in the Reserve Bank of Australia's most recent Financial Stability Review," CBA said in a statement.
"This increase, benefiting depositors, has resulted from increased competition for deposits, as Australian banks reduce their reliance on wholesale funding."
Westpac said while its headline variable rate was 6.71 per cent, it offered packaged discounts which would see most of its customers pay no more than 6.01 per cent.
Group executive retail and business banking Jason Yetton said while wholesale funding pressures had eased, the bank's overall costs, including the price of deposits, remained historically high.
KEEP READING - NEXT ARTICLE
SPONSORED LINKS
Compare all 15 Major Insurers
www.StartIncomeProtection.com.au
Compare All Major Insurers Save 30%
incomeprotection.lisagroup.com.au
Chesty Cough?
www.Bisolvon.com.au
5.84% Variable, 5.89% Comparison Rate.
www.foxsymeshomeloans.com.au

    Thursday 4 October 2012

    Our experts name two top dividend stocks you can buy now By Bruce Jackson with Cat Baab-Muguira |Friday, October 5, 2012


    Our experts name two top dividend stocks you can buy now

    By Bruce Jackson with Cat Baab-Muguira |Friday, October 5, 2012
    Dear Fellow Share Market Investor,
    Bruce Jackson"Shares rise for 6th straight day", screams The Australian Financial Review, the longest rally in 10 months. It puts the S&P/ASX 200 index at 14-month highs.
    Over in the US, the S&P 500 is on the cusp of a five year high. Although most Australians probably wouldn't realise it, the leading US index has jumped 16% so far in 2012.
    Who said high unemployment and a slow economic recovery is bad for the share market?
    Earlier this week, we boldly predicted the death of the term deposit. Based on the response to our message, with investors like you jumping on boardMotley Fool Share Advisor, our premium subscription-only best-of-the-beststock picking service, some of you at least are taking action now.
    Congratulations, and thank you.
    If you've not joined Motley Fool Share Advisor yet, you're not too late. But I wouldn't leave it too long. The opportunity is here right now...and we're offering 2-year subscriptions at a massive 60% discount to our regular price.
    Sign up here.
    You’ve seen the headlines: this week, interest rates sank to lows not seen since 2009. Worse, they’re likely to sink even further. The days of 5% interest rates are well and truly numbered, if not virtually already gone.
    According to The Australian Financial Review, the futures market indicates that “the cash rate could drop to a record low of 2.25 to 2.5 per cent over the next 12 months.”
    Worse, BT Investment Management's Vimal Gor said in same newspaper he's long Australian government bonds "on a prediction the cash rate will bottom out in 2014 at between 1% and 1.5%..."
    Holy term deposit...
    Fortunately, there’s a better spot for your money. In the face of crashing intertest rates, by comparison, solid, dividend-paying shares have arguablynever looked more appealing.
    With that theme in mind, we asked Motley Fool Investment Analysts Scott Phillips and Mike King to each name one of their favourite dividend-paying stocks you can buy now.
    Many of you may already know Scott from his popular columns in The Sydney Morning Herald and The Age, and his regular appearances on Sky Business and CNBC. In fact, just yesterday, he appeared on both channels, although not simultaneously, you might be pleased to know.
    Pick #1: Boasting a 5.8% yield and with shares trading at a discount…
    Investment analyst Scott Phillips’ pick is one that should be familiar to subscribers of our market-thumping Motley Fool Share Advisor member-only newsletter.
    This company is a strong operator in a wonderful business -- one that is justly famous for being asset light, and for the operating leverage and fat profit margins inherent in the model. In fact, Scott’s pick is an absolute cash-flow monster!
    Even better, the industry this company is in has fallen momentarily out of favour. That means we’ve got the chance to buy shares at a discount. So we can collect the dividend -- a sound 5.8% yield -- with the reasonable expectation of share-price appreciation.
    Here’s the lowdown…
    Platinum Asset Management (ASX: PTM) has managed mutual funds and hedge funds for nearly 20 years, but recently fund flows have been hit hard with the overall pullback in the share market. At the same time, some of Platinum’s funds have performed poorly.
    For savvy investors, this spells opportunity. Scott is confident that Platinum is set to bounce back.
    “Economic and investment cycles have always been with us,” he says, “and there’s nothing to suggest that ‘this time is different.’ The same is likely true of Platinum’s investment performance, making the company an attractive investment at this point in the cycle.”
    Sound good? Read on for another promising dividend play...
    Pick #2: Telecom company with fat yield
    Motley Fool investment analyst Mike King has picked a Melbourne-based telecom company that’s trading at a cheap multiple relative to its sector.
    As you may know, the telecom business is attractive based on its recurring-revenue model and runway of growth ahead. But you’d only want to own the best operators.
    Mike’s pick is certainly a strong contender. This company has been expanding margins and growing earnings per share for ten years straight. What’s more, this company just raised its dividend by 28% in the last year!
    Here’s the story…
    M2 Telecommunications (ASX: MTU) supplies telecom, land-line and data services to small businesses and to residences. With a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 9.5 -- against a sector average of 12.6 -- M2 Telecommunications is well positioned for share price appreciation.
    And while you’re waiting, collect the fat 5% yield -- as good as the rates we all once enjoyed on our term deposits.
    Keep in mind, these two picks are really just the beginning.
    Here at The Motley Fool, we’re constantly on the lookout for the very best investments for your hard-earned dollars...like the companies Scott Phillipspublicly named in January in The Sydney Morning Herald as his Top 4 Blue Chips For 2012.
    As of earlier this week, including dividends, Scott’s “top stock portfolio” had returned 23.7% in 2012, well ahead of the All Ordinaries index dividend adjusted return of 11.3%.
    Dividends to enrich a generation
    The two companies highlighted above are worthy of consideration for any dividend-paying portfolio, as are the 8 ASX companies Motley Fool Share Advisor currently rates as a buy. It's no coincidence that all but one of those companies pays a dividend, the two highest yielding stocks currently trading on trailing yields of 7.7% and 6.6% respectively.
    As a reminder, for a strictly limited time, we're offering 2-year subscriptions to Motley Fool Share Advisor at a massive discount to our regular price of $399 for a year's subscription. Sign up today and you can get two years of Motley Fool Share Advisor for only $299 -- a saving of over 60% -- and get instant access to all our current recommendations.
    It might be seemingly easy for the Reserve Bank of Australia to kill term deposits, but it can't touch dividends. A mainstay of investing returns for well over a century, dividends are likely to continue to enrich this generation, and many more generations to come.
    Until next time, as ever, we wish you happy, profitable investing.
    Foolish Best,
    Scott Phillips
    Bruce Jackson
    General Manager
    Motley Fool Australia
    "Must congratulate you all for great stock picking...My joining fee has been returned multiple times... What a fantastic tip averaged in at 46 cents plus received small dividend how good is that..." - Roy, Dromana, Victoria.
    "Keep up the good work! It's nice to know not everyone is out to take you for a ride." - Rohan, Leopold, Victoria.
    "I have a subscription with another advisory group for which I paid five times as much and getting about 20% of the service that I get from you guys"- Tom, NewSouth Wales.
    Click here now to get instant access to The Motley Fool's premium subscription-only stock picking servicesave 60% OFF our 2-year price. This offer is for a strictly limitedperiod of time...

    Retirees can sleep easy owning shares

    By Scott Phillips with Dan Caplinger
    Scott PhillipsIt's almost an unquestioned axiom of retirement planning: As you grow older, you should cut back on your risk. It sounds simple, but is it the right move?
    That's the question Rob Arnott of Research Affiliates asked recently. After studying actual historical results over the past 140 years, Arnott came to what many would deem a highly unexpected answer: Owning shares later in life yields better overall results.
    The basics of asset allocation
    The idea behind what Arnott calls the "glidepath" approach to retirement is pretty simple. Early in life, you can afford to take a lot of risk with your investments, because you have plenty of time before you'll need to use the money. As a result, most financial advisors recommend high allocations to risky assets like shares for young investors.
    Later, though, as you approach retirement, your time horizon shrinks. Typical asset allocation plans call for you to scale back on risk by replacing shares with fixed interest investments.
    As intuitively appealing as the glidepath approach may be, Arnott found that it doesn't produce optimal results. Doing the exact opposite of the glidepath approach -- that is, investing conservatively early in life and then taking more risk as you get closer to retirement -- actually produced far better results in terms of higher account balances at retirement age and more favourable distributions.
    Arnott's results may seem backward, but when you think about them for a while, they make more sense. Maximising returns early in life doesn't do much good because you have very little investment capital built up, so those returns apply only to a very small portfolio. Later in life is when you have the most assets at your disposal, and therefore you stand to gain the most by investing more aggressively to maximise returns.
    A simpler message
    Unfortunately, Arnott doesn't test another scenario: simply keeping a high allocation to shares throughout life. But a 2008 Hartford Investment Management study looked at the issue in a simpler way, comparing various asset allocations held for varying numbers of years.
    The US study found that after just eight years, an 80% shares/20% bond portfolio beat out a 50% shares/40% bond/10% cash portfolio, even when you considered returns in the poorest 5% of the historical distribution.
    In other words, even in nearly worst-case scenarios, the more aggressive portfolio outperformed the "safer" alternative -- and when things went well, the shares-heavy strategy did much better.
    How to sleep at night
    With those higher returns, though, often comes the nervousness of higher volatility. For those nearing retirement, an aggressive portfolio might maximise returns, but it may also come with plenty of sleepless nights.
    That's why it's important to come up with your own strategy to smooth out your returns.
    For some, hybrid securities can bring the prospect of better returns than fixed interest. For others, low-volatility, higher dividend shares can help boost returns.
    The established nature of Telstra’s (ASX: TLS) business model, for example, while not entirely forgoing growth, gives a measure of security to risk-averse investors seeking better returns than are available from bonds or cash investments.
    Don't give up on shares
    Of course, it's far easier to depend on shares after a long bull market. The same high-equity approach got many target retirement funds in trouble back in 2008 and 2009, when their returns suffered. The key determinant still remains ensuring you don’t need your capital in the next 5 years before committing it to an investment in shares.
    As important as it is to start investing early, your pre-retirement years will be the time when you have the most to gain or lose from your investment strategy. Take the time to tailor a strategy that matches up with your needs, and you'll be much happier with the overall outcome.
    Advertisement
    "I enjoy your newsletter, and in fact have done quite well with some of your recommendations. I look forward to each issue."

    -- Richard, Mudgee, NSW
    Congratulations on the great job you guys are doing. IDL was genius."
    -- David, Perth, Western Australia
    Motley Fool Share Advisor is our 'best of the best' subscription newsletter service. And today, you can save 60% off a 2-year subscription -- but for a strictly limited period of time.
    If you're looking to profit from investing in dividend paying stocks, Share Advisor could be the ticket for you. Click here now to save 60% and to gain instant access to Motley Fool Share Advisor.
    Follow us: Follow us on Facebook Facebook  Follow us on Twitter Twitter
    Of the companies mentioned above, Scott Phillips owns shares in Platinum Asset Management and Telstra. Mike King owns shares in M2 Telecommunicaitons. Bruce Jackson has an interest in Telstra. The Motley Fool's disclosure policy is accountable.
    Please remember that investments can go up and down. Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future returns. Performance figures are not intended to be a forecast and The Motley Fool does not guarantee the performance of, or returns on any investment. All figures are accurate as of 5 October 2012.
    © Copyright The Motley Fool Australia Pty Ltd. 2010 - 2012. All rights reserved.
    The Motley Fool, Fool, and the "Fool" logo are registered trademarks of The Motley Fool Holdings, Inc. This material is for personal use only.
    All of the commentary, statements of opinion and recommendations provided in Take Stock contain only general advice and have not taken into account your personal circumstances.
    This e-mail has been sent to you by The Motley Fool because you signed-up for it at some point in the past. If you do not want to receive such e-mails in the future you can unsubscribe by clicking this link:Unsubscribe
    The Motley Fool Australia Pty Ltd PO Box 4635, Ashmore, Queensland 4214 Australia
    The Motley Fool
    ACN: 146 988 052 | ABN: 83 146 988 052 | AFSL: 400691